Rush Limbaugh is given a hard time at Christ and Pop Culture, with certainly good points about his demeanor and comments. But at least his critics here seem to check their facts. In his bid to be a minority owner of the St. Louis Rams, many “racist” and “pro-slavery” quotes have been attributed to him. This article from England’s Daily Telegraph unearths these comments as widely reported, patently false. And best of all, these comments come from major news sources in published newspapers and other outlets, who (as this article notes) spend much self-righteous anger over “bloggers” destroying journalism by not checking facts. No matter how much you may dislike a person’s character or beliefs, have enough respect for public discourse and for your own integrity to fact-check your accusations. Especially if you are in the news business.
Welcome to Christ and Pop Culture
Pop Culture is everywhere. We just acknowledge it. Christ and Pop Culture is an attempt to discuss and think rightly about the common knowledge of our age.
-
Elsewhere – Noteworthy Links
Newt Gingrich Likes to say “Stupid”
The Rise of Christian Libertarianism?
Lingerie Model Quits for Christ
Creative vs Consumer Culture and SOPA
Asian American Poverty and Ethnic Enclaves
It’s Almost Like This Conference This School Is Organizing was Made For You
Reddit raises $65,000 for a Kenyan orphanage in less than a day
Recent Posts

Sacred Space: Superbowl Sunday“Something in the regular life of the church is going to conflict with the Superbowl this Sunday. What ought the church to do?”

Eat Your Vegetables: “The Age of Innocence” (Wharton, 1920)The novel’s tone is thoroughly ironic, as Archer continually misreads as progressive the very traits that consign him to the status quo.

Mixed Signals: What the Christian Message Says to the MassesTargeting a message to your “superfans” doesn’t mean that they are the only ones listening.
Perhaps the #1 rule of approaching a game rightly is as follows: take it seriously, but keep your perspective.

Music at Mars Hill: Lana Del Rey, Rebecca Black, and Ethics“Marketing, branding, image, and production are not just afterthoughts in our musical culture.”
We Recommend:
-
Richard Clark
Lingerie Model Quits for ChristLauren Ewings
Making Sense of “Culture Making”, Part 5: The Jesus EffectBrad Williams
Sacred Space: Superbowl SundayKellen Freeman
Sacred Space: Superbowl SundayDianna
Lingerie Model Quits for ChristDo you Pray and drink Guinness? | The Blog o' Beer: Archive
What Can You Learn From A 250 Year Old Drink?Jared
The Rise of Virtual PacifismDavid Kennedy
Should Christians Buy Their Media Used?
Archive


My main problem with even the people who push his real quotes as being hateful or racist have no idea what his show is about. I’ll hear him say things that are clearly sarcastic, satirical, or hyperbolic, and think, “Man, I can’t wait for someone to get hold of this who thinks he’s serious.”
Consider the “Mmm, mmm, mmm, Barack Hussein Obama,” thing. It doesn’t take a political genius to figure out that he’s mocking hero worhsip, but the commentators called it “insidious”, because they have no sense of humor, and are incapable of detecting sarcasm.
It’s more than the fake quotes, it’s the intentional separation of his quotes from their tone and context, so they can be twisted into something hateful. When you listen to his show you get much more of the context surrounding quotes he’s attacking. As long as people are ripping their opponent’s statements away from the context that gives them meaning so that they can destroy them, it won’t matter if fact checking takes place. Might as well just go with the defense that it sounds like something he would say, even if he didn’t say it.
Charles,
Very good point. I’ve listened to Rush’s radio show enough to tell that he often is being very sarcastic or hyperbolic, as you say. Humor has been a time-honored weapon and he is free to wield it (and if you listen to the show he sometimes does so well). Was Jonathan Swift crazy when his “Modest Proposal” put forward eating Irish children? So is he a cannibal? What about Dostoevsky’s mocking of intellectuals in “Demons”? Does that make him anti-academic? I wonder if a bigger issue isn’t coming about: the death of real humor. We take ourselves too seriously, and rebuff at being offended and cower at giving offense too much. In such a field, humor can’t last. Instead, it runs to increasingly smaller corners seeking the last redoubts of those who can take a joke.
Rush shouldn’t be the only person and the only approach people should listen to; duh. Just like I’m not going to read only academic journals and dead theologians (and hence actually try to partake in pop culture). It’s also why I find the Daily Show often to be very funny even though it pushes political perspectives I don’t agree with. I get the joke and can laugh, even when it might be making fun of me.