Related Articles
-
Podcast #9: Football – America’s Gladitorial Spectal?
09 November 2007 3:42 PM | 1 CommentTweet Click here to listen! When David told me he would be out of town last weekend, we both agreed that it was the perfect time to talk about sports. Though we are both college football fans (Me: Auburn/Florida/Louisville; David: Ohio State/Ohio State/Ohio State), we...
Read More -
Podcast #14: Dumbledore’s Coming Out Party
09 November 2007 3:52 PM | 2 CommentsIt goes without saying that without Harry Potter there would be no show. What else would David have to bring up every single episode - relentlessly - without bringing up Rich's brilliant (Or misguided?) claim that Harry Potter was a Christ figure? Well, J. K. Rowling is clearly messing with our heads. A few weeks ago, she announced to the world, "I always thought of Dumbledore as gay."
Read More -
Embracing Truth in Fiction
16 November 2007 2:07 PM | 10 CommentsIn response to our recent podcast, Sniping for Christ, Seminarian writes: "Are we giving young adults and men further justification that they do not need to grow up? Later, an assertion is made that 'Movies touch on the deep things of life.' Sure, they might, but for many we would have to expose ourselves to sin first, and most teens don’t sit and ponder the questions afterwards anyway."
Read More -
Strike Sadness
09 November 2007 8:52 PM | 1 Comment
Read More
In light of the Writer's Strike, I've been feeling sort of guilty at just how broken up I am about the whole thing. I find myself wincing at the idea of The Office disappearing in two weeks. I cringe at the thought of a giant break after the first eight episodes of Lost. I just assumed this was a sign that I was way too into television.
Richard H. Clark (Co-Founder/Editor-in-Chief) has spent his entire life writing, reading, listening, and playing. He has a Bachelors in Theology from the Baptist College of Florida and has a Master of Arts in Theology and the Arts from the Southern Baptist Theological Seminary. He is fascinated with the extent to which popular culture influences real people. He and his wife currently live in Louisville, KY where he is the classroom technology manager at The Southern Baptist Theological Seminary.
Email: deadyetliving [at] gmail [dot] com. Twitter: @christandpc. Xbox Live: deadyetliving 
You’re right that we shouldn’t get hostile about it, but you miss the point of your own question. As you said, “It just means something different to other people.” Take out the word “just” and you have your answer why it matters. Christmas is an opportunity for us to share the gospel is a loving way, not to avoid the topic completely and promote the idea that everyone go along their own merry way.
Sure, it won’t take away “what we have” which is the celebration of our Savior’s birth. But we’d be missing out on a great opportunity to share the good news that presents itself to us – we don’t even have to go looking for it.
As pastors, one of our responsibilities is to share God’s revelation with others, not to be content that we have it and don’t want to make waves and let others know there is an objective truth.
I’m not sure how relevant it is, but I should point out that the quote is not from a pastor.
I would also add that X-Mas is Christian. It comes from the Greek word for Christ, which begins with an “X.”
Again, I am not sure how relevant that is either.
@Seminarian – Does saying “Merry Christmas” really give us a grant means to evangelism? Conversely, does not saying “Merry Christmas” really lose us something important?
Generally, in my experience, the only people who get mad about “Merry Christmas” are the bitter atheists (as opposed, of course, to the more genial variety) who are only going to react negatively to any insistence to hammer home that holiday greeting that they love so little. Oh and the fundementalist Christians who declare “O noes! Pagan roots!” whenever anything fun comes about. Muslim, Jews, and others, however, seem little bothered by “Merry Christmas” and many even celebrate the holiday in its cultural aspect (though not in the religious aspect, obviously).
Here’s the thing. If someone is deeply offended by the term, there is little to be won by appearing ungracious and causing offense (they say the cross is offense enough). If someone doesn’t care, then it’s hardly any more a tool for evangelism than is a can of Diet Coke.
I’m not a pastor, but one of our privileges as Christians is to share God’s revelation with others. “Merry Christmas” is not God’s revelation, nor is it integral to the sharing of that revelation.