Related Articles
-
Transformers 2: Not Great, but that’s Not the Point
07 July 2009 4:42 PM | 2 CommentsTransformers 2 is everything you feared it would be, but who really cares?
Read More -
Reviewing the Critics: Can We Trust Secular Film Critics?
26 February 2008 3:11 PM | 27 CommentsEditor of Movieguide, Tom Snyder writes,"Just because the secular movie critics and secular elites in Hollywood don’t like some of the movies we pick does not mean that they are really bad movies within the categories in which we pick them. In that sense, ALVIN AND THE CHIPMUNKS was a very entertaining, uplifting family movie that kids would enjoy. The mainstream critics trashed it, but the American audience, many of whom still have strong vestiges of their Christian heritage, even though not all of them may understand essential Christian doctrines like the sinlessness of Christ and the biblical doctrine of salvation by grace through faith, not by works, seemed to like the movie very much."
Read More -
Should the Local Church Embrace Prince Caspian?
15 May 2008 10:59 AM | 2 CommentsRichard Clark begs the church to "Just Say No."
Read More -
Why “Up” is the New Down
01 June 2009 7:55 AM | 5 CommentsHow Pixar's new film destroyed cynicism and defied the naive.
Read More
I don’t know. We’ve been hearing about critic-proof films for at least a decade now. Things like Transformers and G.I. Joe just prove that such a thing truly and honestly exists. (Well, presumably G.I. Joe—as the show has neither the pop cachet nor the Megan Fox that the robot show did.)
I don’t believe this will significantly change the role of film reviewers and it certainly won’t affect critics in any way (if anything, stuff like this gives the latter more to talk about). Reviewers will still be necessary to assist the moviegoing population to make decisions about the 99% of films that aren’t critic-proof. And the role of film critics is not remotely related to box offices so nothing changes for the critic.