<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Perfect&#8230;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.christandpopculture.com/asides/perfect/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.christandpopculture.com/asides/perfect/</link>
	<description>Where the Christian Faith Meets Swiper the Fox</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 01:22:21 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: The Dane</title>
		<link>http://www.christandpopculture.com/asides/perfect/#comment-1863</link>
		<dc:creator>The Dane</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2008 16:05:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.christandpopculture.com/?p=564#comment-1863</guid>
		<description>Really, I don't understand the reviews. They cite complaints like minor technical issues and AI bugs, but then give the game the highest possible rating. What would they give the same game if it didn't have those bugs? 110%?

Videogame review is one of pop-culture's most insular, hegemonic no-man's lands of insensibility. It's shown itself to be almost entirely worthless.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Really, I don&#8217;t understand the reviews. They cite complaints like minor technical issues and AI bugs, but then give the game the highest possible rating. What would they give the same game if it didn&#8217;t have those bugs? 110%?</p>
<p>Videogame review is one of pop-culture&#8217;s most insular, hegemonic no-man&#8217;s lands of insensibility. It&#8217;s shown itself to be almost entirely worthless.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
