TV Viewing Breaks Records: “Nielsen reports in today’s LA Times that the average American now watches more than 151 hours of TV a month. That’s about 5 hours a day and an all time high – up 3.6% from last year.”
(HT: Collide Magazine)
Related Articles
-
Podcast #9: Football – America’s Gladitorial Spectal?
09 November 2007 3:42 PM | 1 CommentTweet Click here to listen! When David told me he would be out of town last weekend, we both agreed that it was the perfect time to talk about sports. Though we are both college football fans (Me: Auburn/Florida/Louisville; David: Ohio State/Ohio State/Ohio State), we...
Read More -
Podcast #28: Christianity Today, Boundless, Sex, and the City
18 June 2008 5:15 PM | 9 CommentsRichard Clark and Ben Bartlett discuss the Sex and the City backlash.
Read More -
Who Cares About Hollywood?
28 January 2008 4:14 PM | 4 CommentsI imagine a large number of people don't usually care about the Oscars, but those numbers must have increased this year. The nominees have been announced and the season is upon us, and yet this year Oscar the Grouch is probably gaining more attention (though Ben Bartlett would probably say that he always gets more attention). But it's not just the mediocre awards show that is gaining little-to-no applause from fans this year, it seems to me that no one really even cares about Hollywood at all this year.
Read More -
Sesame Street: Today’s New England Primer
20 November 2007 1:17 PM | 5 CommentsDaniel Boorstin is my favorite historian. He has written widely and well on some of the key players, events, and influences on both world and American history. Perhaps my favorite piece of his work, though, is an article he wrote discussing the role of the historian called, "The Historian: 'A Wrestler with the Angel.'" He points out that the greatest challenge for the historian is to discover the things that TRULY move history.
Read More
I absolutely do not believe this statistic.
The Danes last blog post..20081119.ChurchLies
I do.
Potentially (!) I could see the number hitting this if we counted people who run television all day, whether they’re watching it or not (which would count any time I go to a restaurant, since they almost invariably have five screens bombarding my dining experience—so would a one-hour lunch then count as five hours of viewing?).
The thing is: I just don’t know people who watch like this. I don’t think. Maybe (and I won’t rule this out) Southern California, with its so-called fast-paced lifestyle doesn’t have time for this kind of thing but more easy-paced parts of the country do, off-setting numbers that might be closer to six weekly.
Really, I’m just highly suspicious of Nielsen numbers because their control group is ridiculous and has no actual control. Say a household of five has a single television and it’s equipped and tracked by Nielsen. Say at 8:30 on Tuesday, a half-hour program is watched. How does Nielsen track that? As having five viewers, thus counting as 2.5 hours? Or simply as a half hour. Or when they say the Average American, do they instead mean the average American household? These things are just absolutely impossible to track. And how do they decide who gets tracked? Could I who watch no television get tracked? Do they skew their survey to more voracious viewers in order to better gauge the popularity of shows?
The Danes last blog post..20081119.ChurchLies
My wife just suggested that it may be the elderly who skew the averages so high, remarking anecdotally that her grandmother, who had nothing to do would just park in front of the television pretty much all day long, not necessarily glued to the set, but watching nonetheless.
The next and obvious question then is: are the elderly real Americans? Discuss.
The Danes last blog post..20081119.ChurchLies