By Richard Clark –
April 28, 2009
But why do we even need game criticism? Because criticism enriches art. There’s something rewarding about watching a film, reading a piece of criticism, re-watching and the film and feeling like you get it. Likewise, there’s an immense pleasure in being a critic and unlocking a complex piece of art. Criticism is an empowering form. Which brings us to the main question: If criticism is so great, why is there no great game criticism?
via The House Next Door: The Alligators Have Good Graphics: Beginning Game Criticism, Vol. 1.
Related Articles
-
What’s So Great About 2008?
03 January 2008 2:25 PM |
13 Comments
Even though Christ and Pop Culture is only a few months old, we've already had some wonderful conversations about popular culture and how we as believers should interact with it. To start off the year, I thought I would give my list of the pop culture events that I am looking forward to most in 2008. Over the next 12 months I hope to revisit each of these events as they unfold and as we continue to explore the way our faith speaks to every aspect of our lives--even pop culture.
-
What was Actually So Great About 2008
29 December 2008 12:44 PM |
6 Comments
Alan Noble takes back some of the foolish things he said in the past.
-
Enter Into the Great and Disturbing Silence
30 June 2008 12:37 PM |
21 Comments
A documentary about monks challenges Bill Reichart to sit down and shut up every once and a while. Now, Bill challenges us to do the same.
-
Reviewing the Critics: Can We Trust Secular Film Critics?
26 February 2008 3:11 PM |
27 Comments
Editor of Movieguide, Tom Snyder writes,"Just because the secular movie critics and secular elites in Hollywood don’t like some of the movies we pick does not mean that they are really bad movies within the categories in which we pick them. In that sense, ALVIN AND THE CHIPMUNKS was a very entertaining, uplifting family movie that kids would enjoy. The mainstream critics trashed it, but the American audience, many of whom still have strong vestiges of their Christian heritage, even though not all of them may understand essential Christian doctrines like the sinlessness of Christ and the biblical doctrine of salvation by grace through faith, not by works, seemed to like the movie very much."
About the Author

Richard H. Clark (Co-Founder/Editor-in-Chief) has spent his entire life writing, reading, listening, and playing. He has a Bachelors in Theology from the Baptist College of Florida and has a Master of Arts in Theology and the Arts from the Southern Baptist Theological Seminary. He is fascinated with the extent to which popular culture influences real people. He and his wife currently live in Louisville, KY where he is the classroom technology manager at The Southern Baptist Theological Seminary.
Email: deadyetliving [at] gmail [dot] com. Twitter: @christandpc. Xbox Live: deadyetliving
Is anyone doing game crit besides The Escapist?
The Danes last blog post..20090417.teaParty
The Dane – I linked to some here.
Granted, I haven’t had enough time to offer them full attention, but from the cursory review I was able to give, these sites largely traffic only in writing about videogames and videogame culture intelligently. Now that’s not a bad thing. In fact, it can be very good. Intelligent writing, however, is not necessarily criticism either.
Of those mentioned, I think Hit Self Destruct comes closest to devoting itself to criticism. But even that seems more devoted to just intelligent treatments of the topic.
And this isn’t a bad thing. Gaming absolutely needs intelligent, well-considered treatment of itself. It also needs critics. Not reviewers or people who can write well about games, but people who can offer full-bodied analysis of the games themselves, discussing their place in gaming history, their place within their immediate context, their motivations and unrealized goals, what they are saying both overtly and via subtext. I want to see for gaming criticism rise at leat to the level of what people like M. Leary do for film.
p.s. I played a few levels of the Braid demo. That definitely seems worth the fifteen bux. Though of course, like any other puzzle game, it won’t be worth more than one replay…
Told you it was worth it.
But yeah, I played it through once and I’m done with it, even though there are supposedly some sort of stars or constellations or something to find. I just can’t bring myself to do it.