‘Woot’ Named Merriam-Webster’s Word of the Year
Related Articles
-
The CNN-YouTube Republican Debate: How Mike Huckabee Got it Wrong
29 November 2007 1:20 PM | 37 CommentsLast night’s CNN-Youtube debate was fascinating for a number of reasons. One was the moment that a sarcastic-looking kid basically asked a question about biblical inerrancy and the following took place:
Read More -
A New Paradigm for Christian Politics
11 December 2007 12:27 PM | 30 CommentsChristmas is, “in the air,” for a longer period each year. This time around, I started hearing Christmas songs before Thanksgiving week! However, even Christmas cannot compare to the length of time we spend talking about politics, especially in a presidential election year.
Read More -
Sesame Street: A Method to the Madness
27 November 2007 11:19 AM | 8 CommentsLet’s say you want to research preschoolers, but your study requires children who are NOT able to recognize Sesame Street characters. So you, “interview,” one child. And another. And another. Nielson Media Research has shown that it will take a long time to finish your study, because as of 2004 they found that 99% of American preschoolers recognized the Sesame Street characters.
Read More
W00t!!!1!11!!!
Well, somebody had to do it.
I don’t mind this at all since it’s not a corruption of a different word. It’s not teh, or brb, or l8er.
The day when lawl gets in the dictionary is the day I….well, I’ll think of something.
Funny, they spelled it wrong. w00t. not woot. I have now lost all faith in the dictionary as a bastion of good spelling.
Actually The Dane, Merriam-Webster spelled it correctly w00t with zeros, but Wired spelled it wrong.
See Merriam-Webster.
My faith is restored!! Boo Wired.
Now I have lost all faith in Wired.