Collide Magazine: “We Respectfully Disagree With John Piper …“
Related Articles
-
An Ecclesiology of Twitter
28 May 2009 8:49 AM | 17 CommentsTwitter is all about community, so isn't it the perfect fit for church worship service?
Read More -
The Gospel Coalition Conference: Redefining “Cool”
27 April 2009 8:41 AM | 4 CommentsDavid Dunham learns that the gospel comes first.
Read More -
Podcast #11: Does the Emporer of the “The Kingdom” Have No Clothes?
09 November 2007 3:44 PM | 3 CommentsTweet Click here to listen! Remember back in the day, when Rich and David used to disagree on things? Man, those were the days. Fortunately, those days are back, and now Rich and David are convinced that the other is completely wrong! It makes for...
Read More -
Sticks and Stones, Redux: A Review of a Review of a Review
03 June 2009 7:19 AM | 5 CommentsA reviewer responds to criticism.
Read More
Richard H. Clark (Co-Founder/Editor-in-Chief) has spent his entire life writing, reading, listening, and playing. He has a Bachelors in Theology from the Baptist College of Florida and has a Master of Arts in Theology and the Arts from the Southern Baptist Theological Seminary. He is fascinated with the extent to which popular culture influences real people. He and his wife currently live in Louisville, KY where he is the classroom technology manager at The Southern Baptist Theological Seminary.
Email: deadyetliving [at] gmail [dot] com. Twitter: @christandpc. Xbox Live: deadyetliving 
I have theological reasons for mistrusting the use of drama in church, but those reasons don’t rest on anything near so solid of ground as another kind of reason. That is to say: while I won’t use my theological ground to create a dogma, I am perfectly happy to rely upon another form of reason.
See, the thing is? I find the use of drama in church to be embarrassing. Excruciatingly so. I instantly feel bad for every participant. Like watching a Ben Stiller movie or having to sit through Michael Scoot interacting with the public. It’s that bad.
See, I know they mean well and all, but the fact is: it takes a very special kind of person with very particular kinds of tolerances to take this kind of drama seriously. To the rest of us, it just comes off as cheesy. And to those particularly sensitive to people making fools of themselves without realizing it, the use of drama actively engenders psychological pain.
When I read things like this Collide article, much more than just my critical mind rebels (though that certainly does, since the article was not particularly rigourous*). Instead, I just wonder, Why? Why would you want to do that? Why would you want to add failed drama to the drama of the word, to the drama of the Table? Why people would wish to conspire to distract me from what’s overtly worthwhile by inducing a cringe reflex is just flatly beyond me.
*note: an article that says things like,
proves that it shouldn’t be taken seriously on any theological level.
The Danes last blog post..20090417.teaParty