<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:series="http://unfoldingneurons.com/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Looking Forward: Film and TV in 2009</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.christandpopculture.com/featured/looking-forward-film-and-tv-in-2009/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.christandpopculture.com/featured/looking-forward-film-and-tv-in-2009/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=looking-forward-film-and-tv-in-2009</link>
	<description>Where The Christian Faith Meets The Common Knowledge of Our Age</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 15:56:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Dane</title>
		<link>http://www.christandpopculture.com/featured/looking-forward-film-and-tv-in-2009/#comment-12507</link>
		<dc:creator>The Dane</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jan 2009 17:11:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.christandpopculture.com/?p=2046#comment-12507</guid>
		<description>&lt;b&gt;Re &lt;i&gt;The Road&lt;/i&gt;:&lt;/b&gt;
I&#039;d be excited to see a faithful adaptation of the novel &lt;i&gt;only&lt;/i&gt; if the film is under eighty minutes in length. Built as a terse visit to earth&#039;s vainglorious future, &lt;i&gt;The Road&lt;/i&gt; could come off a deeply impactful, tightly wrought film. As a shorter feature film, it has the power to make its statement undiluted. Anything longer and every five minutes will increase its chances of becoming overbearing&#8212;in which case it will lose the strength of its single-minded homiletic.

That&#039;s if it&#039;s faithful to the novel. They could make a three-hour epic out of it if they decide to add liberally to what McCarthy designed.

@Alan - With the exception of your reference to the cultural mandate (a doctrinal concept I still find unmerited in the scriptural evidence&#8212;&lt;a href=&quot;/asides/christianity-today-reviews-christ-and-culture-revisited/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;see comments&lt;/a&gt;), you like post-apocalyptic literature for the same reason I do (and indeed, I like science/speculative fiction for this reason too). It&#039;s distilled mis-en-scene, allowing for clarity in exploring the human state and the social/ethical questions that get confused in more heterogeneous circumstances.

&lt;b&gt;Re &lt;i&gt;Watchmen&lt;/i&gt;:&lt;/b&gt;
While I&#039;m cautiously hopeful that it will be a good film despite the fact that its source is virtually untranslatable to the screen (due its reliance upon the comic book form to make its points), I&#039;m highly doubtful that the film will garner any real box-office success. &lt;i&gt;Watchmen&lt;/i&gt; will be rated R and won&#039;t contain any of the action and violence that made &lt;i&gt;300&lt;/i&gt; popular (and as far as scene design, Frank Miller proves a much more dynamic scenist than Dave Gibbons&#8212;who created &lt;i&gt;Watchmen&lt;/i&gt;&#039;s visual flow). There will be sexuality and likely quite a bit of nudity (mostly male), which will eliminate a large number of the youth ticket (parents are much happier with their children seeing R-rated films that aren&#039;t primarily R for their naughty bits).

I have a feeling that &lt;i&gt;Watchmen&lt;/i&gt; will only be popular if it significantly departs from the book&#8212;the changed ending makes it obvious that they&#039;re trying to alter some of the book&#039;s less popular elements.

@Rich - Have you read &lt;i&gt;Watchmen&lt;/i&gt;?

@Adam - Why is it do you think that &lt;i&gt;The Dark Knight&lt;/i&gt; should have received an Oscar nomination? I thought it was pretty cool (except for Bale&#039;s inability to enunciate), but it struck me as being pretty far from The Awesome that people are declaring it. Possibly the best superhero film ever. Probably in the top five of comic adaptations. But I fail to see what recommends the film to get top honours for the year. I experience the same disconnect when people talk about &lt;i&gt;WALL-E&lt;/i&gt; like this. It was a fine film, but not even in the Top 5 (or probably even 10) of animated films ever (heck, I saw one last week that was better).

&lt;abbr&gt;&lt;em&gt;The Danes last blog post..&lt;a href=&quot;http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/nowheresville/~3/458899734/2008_11_01_old1.php&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;20081119.ChurchLies&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/abbr&gt;&lt;/em&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>Re <i>The Road</i>:</b><br />
I&#8217;d be excited to see a faithful adaptation of the novel <i>only</i> if the film is under eighty minutes in length. Built as a terse visit to earth&#8217;s vainglorious future, <i>The Road</i> could come off a deeply impactful, tightly wrought film. As a shorter feature film, it has the power to make its statement undiluted. Anything longer and every five minutes will increase its chances of becoming overbearing&#8212;in which case it will lose the strength of its single-minded homiletic.</p>
<p>That&#8217;s if it&#8217;s faithful to the novel. They could make a three-hour epic out of it if they decide to add liberally to what McCarthy designed.</p>
<p>@Alan &#8211; With the exception of your reference to the cultural mandate (a doctrinal concept I still find unmerited in the scriptural evidence&#8212;<a href="/asides/christianity-today-reviews-christ-and-culture-revisited/" rel="nofollow">see comments</a>), you like post-apocalyptic literature for the same reason I do (and indeed, I like science/speculative fiction for this reason too). It&#8217;s distilled mis-en-scene, allowing for clarity in exploring the human state and the social/ethical questions that get confused in more heterogeneous circumstances.</p>
<p><b>Re <i>Watchmen</i>:</b><br />
While I&#8217;m cautiously hopeful that it will be a good film despite the fact that its source is virtually untranslatable to the screen (due its reliance upon the comic book form to make its points), I&#8217;m highly doubtful that the film will garner any real box-office success. <i>Watchmen</i> will be rated R and won&#8217;t contain any of the action and violence that made <i>300</i> popular (and as far as scene design, Frank Miller proves a much more dynamic scenist than Dave Gibbons&#8212;who created <i>Watchmen</i>&#8216;s visual flow). There will be sexuality and likely quite a bit of nudity (mostly male), which will eliminate a large number of the youth ticket (parents are much happier with their children seeing R-rated films that aren&#8217;t primarily R for their naughty bits).</p>
<p>I have a feeling that <i>Watchmen</i> will only be popular if it significantly departs from the book&#8212;the changed ending makes it obvious that they&#8217;re trying to alter some of the book&#8217;s less popular elements.</p>
<p>@Rich &#8211; Have you read <i>Watchmen</i>?</p>
<p>@Adam &#8211; Why is it do you think that <i>The Dark Knight</i> should have received an Oscar nomination? I thought it was pretty cool (except for Bale&#8217;s inability to enunciate), but it struck me as being pretty far from The Awesome that people are declaring it. Possibly the best superhero film ever. Probably in the top five of comic adaptations. But I fail to see what recommends the film to get top honours for the year. I experience the same disconnect when people talk about <i>WALL-E</i> like this. It was a fine film, but not even in the Top 5 (or probably even 10) of animated films ever (heck, I saw one last week that was better).</p>
<p><abbr><em>The Danes last blog post..<a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/nowheresville/~3/458899734/2008_11_01_old1.php" rel="nofollow">20081119.ChurchLies</a></em></abbr></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason</title>
		<link>http://www.christandpopculture.com/featured/looking-forward-film-and-tv-in-2009/#comment-12482</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jan 2009 15:22:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.christandpopculture.com/?p=2046#comment-12482</guid>
		<description>I just wanted to point out that John Hillcoat also directed a fantastic film called &lt;i&gt;The Proposition&lt;/i&gt; a few years back. Here&#039;s &lt;a href=&quot;http://opuszine.com/movie_reviews/review/the_proposition/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;my review&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just wanted to point out that John Hillcoat also directed a fantastic film called <i>The Proposition</i> a few years back. Here&#8217;s <a href="http://opuszine.com/movie_reviews/review/the_proposition/" rel="nofollow">my review</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

