<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:series="http://unfoldingneurons.com/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Podcast #29: The Podcast about Nothing</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.christandpopculture.com/featured/podcast-29-the-podcast-about-nothing/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.christandpopculture.com/featured/podcast-29-the-podcast-about-nothing/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=podcast-29-the-podcast-about-nothing</link>
	<description>Where The Christian Faith Meets The Common Knowledge of Our Age</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 15:56:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ben Bartlett</title>
		<link>http://www.christandpopculture.com/featured/podcast-29-the-podcast-about-nothing/#comment-4973</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben Bartlett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Sep 2008 17:19:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.christandpopculture.com/?p=1270#comment-4973</guid>
		<description>I think there&#039;s a distinction between &quot;believing in nothing&quot; and believing that there is no God and no ultimate purpose or meaning.

I can&#039;t remember exactly how I phrased it on the show, but I think the goal of the working definition was to picture a person who is atheistic, and wants to construct their morality on the basis of that notion.  So Tyler Durden is a good example because he basically kills off God in his mind, and then constructs a moral system on that basis... namely, that societal structure should honor strength and manliness and physicality rather than the doing of dull jobs to buy useless stuff.

And it&#039;s probably true that some of the examples are imperfect, but movies aren&#039;t constructed to fit into easy categories.  I think we just wanted to highlight the nihilistic trends or themes that can be seen in various characters or portions of movies.  They are pretty distinct from normal movie fare, with a bunch of pseudo-moralists willingly participating in various aspects of the rat race.

The atheist I WOULD exclude from this category is the one who, as Neitzsche points out, says he does not believe in God but continues to have an irrational moral system that is basically inherited piecemeal from Christianity or some other religion.  Vonnegut is a great example... he doesn&#039;t believe in God, but holds on to some morality that doesn&#039;t make a whole lot of sense given the premise.

Ben Bartletts last blog post..&lt;a href=&quot;http://benbartlett.blogspot.com/2008/09/moses-and-me-practicing-faith-and.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Moses and me: Practicing Faith and Pragmatism&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think there&#8217;s a distinction between &#8220;believing in nothing&#8221; and believing that there is no God and no ultimate purpose or meaning.</p>
<p>I can&#8217;t remember exactly how I phrased it on the show, but I think the goal of the working definition was to picture a person who is atheistic, and wants to construct their morality on the basis of that notion.  So Tyler Durden is a good example because he basically kills off God in his mind, and then constructs a moral system on that basis&#8230; namely, that societal structure should honor strength and manliness and physicality rather than the doing of dull jobs to buy useless stuff.</p>
<p>And it&#8217;s probably true that some of the examples are imperfect, but movies aren&#8217;t constructed to fit into easy categories.  I think we just wanted to highlight the nihilistic trends or themes that can be seen in various characters or portions of movies.  They are pretty distinct from normal movie fare, with a bunch of pseudo-moralists willingly participating in various aspects of the rat race.</p>
<p>The atheist I WOULD exclude from this category is the one who, as Neitzsche points out, says he does not believe in God but continues to have an irrational moral system that is basically inherited piecemeal from Christianity or some other religion.  Vonnegut is a great example&#8230; he doesn&#8217;t believe in God, but holds on to some morality that doesn&#8217;t make a whole lot of sense given the premise.</p>
<p>Ben Bartletts last blog post..<a href="http://benbartlett.blogspot.com/2008/09/moses-and-me-practicing-faith-and.html" rel="nofollow">Moses and me: Practicing Faith and Pragmatism</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Dane</title>
		<link>http://www.christandpopculture.com/featured/podcast-29-the-podcast-about-nothing/#comment-4970</link>
		<dc:creator>The Dane</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Sep 2008 17:02:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.christandpopculture.com/?p=1270#comment-4970</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m just saying, I&#039;m pretty far from a technical philosopher (or even a philosopher) but you offer the working definition of nihilism as being someone who believes in nothing and then offer examples like Tyler Durden, who pretty clearly believes in something. (He&#039;s an anarchist because he wants to promote values that would bring about a better world, not because he just wants to watch the world burn. He&#039;s principled and has a belief system, though it be an atheistic one.)

I don&#039;t think my hesitation here is due so much to technicality as it&#039;s just that the examples don&#039;t seem to fit the category you describe. Unless maybe you&#039;re stretching your definition to umbrella &lt;i&gt;all&lt;/i&gt; atheists... 

Incidentally, I just thought you should know that it was not me who gave the one-star rating there. Just in case you thought it was me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m just saying, I&#8217;m pretty far from a technical philosopher (or even a philosopher) but you offer the working definition of nihilism as being someone who believes in nothing and then offer examples like Tyler Durden, who pretty clearly believes in something. (He&#8217;s an anarchist because he wants to promote values that would bring about a better world, not because he just wants to watch the world burn. He&#8217;s principled and has a belief system, though it be an atheistic one.)</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t think my hesitation here is due so much to technicality as it&#8217;s just that the examples don&#8217;t seem to fit the category you describe. Unless maybe you&#8217;re stretching your definition to umbrella <i>all</i> atheists&#8230; </p>
<p>Incidentally, I just thought you should know that it was not me who gave the one-star rating there. Just in case you thought it was me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard Clark</title>
		<link>http://www.christandpopculture.com/featured/podcast-29-the-podcast-about-nothing/#comment-4969</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard Clark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Sep 2008 16:39:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.christandpopculture.com/?p=1270#comment-4969</guid>
		<description>Yeah, I think it&#039;s pretty clear we need to be talking about &lt;i&gt;inconsistent&lt;/i&gt; nihilists for the most part. The more consistent one becomes in nihilistic belief, one would either get crazier or closer to Christ.

Richard Clarks last blog post..&lt;a href=&quot;http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/ChristAndPopCulture/~3/401257789/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;LGBT Says “Whoo!”&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, I think it&#8217;s pretty clear we need to be talking about <i>inconsistent</i> nihilists for the most part. The more consistent one becomes in nihilistic belief, one would either get crazier or closer to Christ.</p>
<p>Richard Clarks last blog post..<a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/ChristAndPopCulture/~3/401257789/" rel="nofollow">LGBT Says “Whoo!”</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Christ &#38; Nihilism? &#171; Christ In The City</title>
		<link>http://www.christandpopculture.com/featured/podcast-29-the-podcast-about-nothing/#comment-4968</link>
		<dc:creator>Christ &#38; Nihilism? &#171; Christ In The City</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Sep 2008 15:43:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.christandpopculture.com/?p=1270#comment-4968</guid>
		<description>[...] &amp;&#160;Nihilism?  24 09 2008   In a recent podcast by Christ &amp; Pop Culture Rich Clark and Ben Bartlett discuss the presence of nihilism in pop-culture. For those of you [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] &amp;&nbsp;Nihilism?  24 09 2008   In a recent podcast by Christ &amp; Pop Culture Rich Clark and Ben Bartlett discuss the presence of nihilism in pop-culture. For those of you [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ben Bartlett</title>
		<link>http://www.christandpopculture.com/featured/podcast-29-the-podcast-about-nothing/#comment-4965</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben Bartlett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Sep 2008 13:04:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.christandpopculture.com/?p=1270#comment-4965</guid>
		<description>Well, if we limited the definition of nihilism to sociopaths it would be a pretty short show.

I&#039;ve seen a lot of movie reviews that refer to characters or movies having &quot;nihilistic leanings&quot; or things like that.  I think our goal was to highlight why these characters are compelling, how they compare to Christianity, and how we should react.

And as I mentioned, technical philosophers love to clarify and define things out of existence... we were looking more to think about a simple, broad definition that will help our awareness of certain movie trends.

Ben Bartletts last blog post..&lt;a href=&quot;http://benbartlett.blogspot.com/2008/09/moses-and-me-practicing-faith-and.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Moses and me: Practicing Faith and Pragmatism&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, if we limited the definition of nihilism to sociopaths it would be a pretty short show.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve seen a lot of movie reviews that refer to characters or movies having &#8220;nihilistic leanings&#8221; or things like that.  I think our goal was to highlight why these characters are compelling, how they compare to Christianity, and how we should react.</p>
<p>And as I mentioned, technical philosophers love to clarify and define things out of existence&#8230; we were looking more to think about a simple, broad definition that will help our awareness of certain movie trends.</p>
<p>Ben Bartletts last blog post..<a href="http://benbartlett.blogspot.com/2008/09/moses-and-me-practicing-faith-and.html" rel="nofollow">Moses and me: Practicing Faith and Pragmatism</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave Dunham</title>
		<link>http://www.christandpopculture.com/featured/podcast-29-the-podcast-about-nothing/#comment-4964</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave Dunham</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Sep 2008 12:50:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.christandpopculture.com/?p=1270#comment-4964</guid>
		<description>Dane,

     I think there is a difference between what is considered pure philosophic nihilism and the pop-nihilism that Rich and Ben are discussing here.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dane,</p>
<p>     I think there is a difference between what is considered pure philosophic nihilism and the pop-nihilism that Rich and Ben are discussing here.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Dane</title>
		<link>http://www.christandpopculture.com/featured/podcast-29-the-podcast-about-nothing/#comment-4938</link>
		<dc:creator>The Dane</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Sep 2008 05:44:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.christandpopculture.com/?p=1270#comment-4938</guid>
		<description>I would just like to say Re Entertainment Weekly: 
If Owen Gleiberman rates something well, it may be worth a look. If Lisa Schwarzbaum rates something at all, you&#039;re better off asking your local mentally derailed hobo for an opinion, because that hobo will talk sense 80% more often than Lisa Schwarzbaum.

I know you guys were trying to avoid getting too technical with your nihilism argument, but really, a lot of your examples seemed like whole other philosophies to me. Philosophies produced in absence of God, sure, but non-nihilistic philosophies regardless.

I think the only truly nihilistic characters we encounter are all sociopaths. And it&#039;s not that all sociopaths are even nihilistic. It&#039;s just that only a sociopath can possibly be a nihilist who doesn&#039;t cheat by eating chicken and fish.

The Danes last blog post..&lt;a href=&quot;http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/nowheresville/~3/400941099/2008_09_01_old1.php&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;20080923&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would just like to say Re Entertainment Weekly:<br />
If Owen Gleiberman rates something well, it may be worth a look. If Lisa Schwarzbaum rates something at all, you&#8217;re better off asking your local mentally derailed hobo for an opinion, because that hobo will talk sense 80% more often than Lisa Schwarzbaum.</p>
<p>I know you guys were trying to avoid getting too technical with your nihilism argument, but really, a lot of your examples seemed like whole other philosophies to me. Philosophies produced in absence of God, sure, but non-nihilistic philosophies regardless.</p>
<p>I think the only truly nihilistic characters we encounter are all sociopaths. And it&#8217;s not that all sociopaths are even nihilistic. It&#8217;s just that only a sociopath can possibly be a nihilist who doesn&#8217;t cheat by eating chicken and fish.</p>
<p>The Danes last blog post..<a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/nowheresville/~3/400941099/2008_09_01_old1.php" rel="nofollow">20080923</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

