Predictably Unpredictable
David Dunham grows bored with the same old catastrophes and heroism.
by David Dunham

Some television shows and movies are so predictable it’s funny. My wife and I have even turned it into a game from time to time, seeing who can guess the next move of the characters, the ending, or what happens to the love interests in the story. I noticed this recently when we started watching the very predictable, though somewhat endearing, Sci-Fi original Eureka. The show is sometimes so easy to predict that I am often fooled into thinking I wrote it myself. But one prediction set me on a particular train of thought that has led me to this post: In Eureka everyday is predictably unpredictable.
Shows like Eureka are built on a never ending cycle of outrageous, cataclysmic, life-threatening events that get solved in 45 minutes, only to be repeated next episode in some other fashion. Take for example an episode from season one. In this particular episode we find our heroes faced with a major dilemma. A set of old nuclear missels have popped up all over Eureka and are about to be launched into the sky and bring utter desolation to their target, not to mention totally messing up the roads and neighborhoods of Eureka. So, naturally, our heroes must disengage the missles in time. Of course they do (sorry to ruin the ending), but then comes the next episode, in which our heroes have had their brains chemically altered by toxic plants, which must be cut down. You get the idea: it’s one big catastrophe averted after another.
What this has led me to consider, however, is just how much television and film portrays the normal life of individuals as utterly exciting, daring, and heroic. My life does not often seem like this, and I don’t imagine yours does either. My life involves changing dirty diapers, fixing the dishwasher, and printing church bulletins. It has moments of excitement (like the bat in my dinning room), but in them I often look less heroic than my TV counterparts (like when I fall on the floor because that rat with wings almost flew into my face). So my curious question is: do television shows like Eureka (and nearly everything else) breed in its viewers a dissatisfaction with life?
I can’t help but wonder if the reason so many people are lured in to alternate realities, second lives on the internet, etc. is because they’ve been seduced by the exciting romances, jobs, friendships, and parties that film and television portray. Books, of course, can do this too, and it is the nature of such art to portray things that captivate our attention. Nonetheless, do we feed our unhappiness by indulging in such things?
I don’t have the exact answers, as you’ve come to expect if you’ve read any of my previous articles, but I know it is a question that I must contemplate in my own heart. Furthermore, it is one I would encourage you to contemplate as well. The next time you want to compare your romance to Sleepless in Seattle, or your job to Jack Bauer’s give some pause. Our lives may not be all that exciting, all the time, but these shows have their predictable parts too, and if you look closely and follow the path you might even get bored with their stories.
Readers, we want to know:
- Is it even possible to make an engaging film or television show that is realistically mundane? Examples?
- Do you ever find yourself growing bored with life? Do you think it has anything to do with shows or movies like this?



















It may be that the mind constantly yearns to be stretched, challenged, and experience new things. Movies and books that accomplish this provide a sense of pleasure or satisfaction to the mind.
Minnesota Attorneys last blog post..Employment Law: Information for Small Businesses
I certainly think it’s possible to make engaging film/television that is realistically mundane. A few examples that come to mind (these are all films):
Café Lumière – Hou Hsiao-Hsien
The Vertical Ray Of The Sun – Tran Anh Hung
The Scent Of Green Papaya – Tran Anh Hung
The Son – The Dardenne Brothers
Yi Yi – Edward Yang
The World – Jia Zhangke
Junebug – Phil Morrison
I’d consider all of these films to be “realistically mundane”, and in their finest moments, find a sort of transcendent beauty in the more mundane aspects of life without resorting to “outrageous, cataclysmic, life-threatening events that get solved in 45 minutes” (as you put it).
I don’t watch many hyper shows or movies (I don’t watch much, period), but I still get bored by life. I attribute it to acedia, which impeded hermits in the desert millenia ago, and which will seek all sorts of things to distract itself, TV or no TV. Like, as David points out, books. Or other art. Or people. Or food. Or exercise. If I’m using those things to distract me from being present to my calling in the mundane, that’s sin, even though those things are in themselves good. I could plausibly watch a hyper show without using it as a crutch to acedia. Then it’s just predictable. And boring.
My wife and I play the same game watching Numbers. It’s almost uncomfortable when we’re wrong.
For us, at least, books hold a much stronger power than TV or movies. In order to get the full effect of a novel you have to put yourself in the environment, visualize the characters and events (which can easily take the form of your own fears and desires), and walk with them internally and externally through the story. It takes work, and it lingers.
I don’t have a problem with using fiction as a means of escape, as long as it’s not where you hide, or you allow yourself to be mastered by it.
Lately I’ve been watching Sliders through Netflix streaming, and I am constantly caught off-guard by the plot twists and the social commentary. I’ve actually found myself referring to the metaphors of the show to describe things in conversation. Which illustrates another point – sometimes you have to lose yourself in (good) fiction to better understand reality.
Charles Joness last blog post..Of Mice and Moms: Inheriting Intelligence
That’s a good point Charles, and to be sure I am not knocking escapism itself. I know a great deal of Christians who are totally against the concept of escapism, Leland Ryken has written on it and does not view it favorably. But you’re right, in my view, to say that where escapism becomes bad is when people live in it or let it dominate them.
Leave your response!
Welcome to Christ and Pop Culture
Some of Our Favorite Articles
Recent Comments
Get New Posts via Email
Become our friend!
Writers
Subscribe
Archive
Posts Like This
Most Loved
Most Commented
Most Viewed