You’re right, I do not mention Christian existentialism, but that has more to do with the nature of the post which required brevity. I would say that while I find allusions to order and spirituality, specifically from the Christian worldview, I don’t think the text is clear on the nature of that worldview. In other words, I think reading the novel as engaging Christian existentialism would be very useful, but ultimately I don’t think the text gives the reader enough to make any definitive statement.

Regarding your statement about the “punch line,” I think you are referring to Carissa’s question, not my own. However, I would not agree that such a question is condescending any more than the entire concept of evangelism is condescending. After all, this is a site made for Christians to consider how to properly engage popular culture, and as such, I think questioning whether or not a work of art/culture contributes to the Great Commission is a very relevant question. If this were an actual review of the novel and if it were published specifically to a broad audience of Christians and non-Christians, then I would say that such a question would be out of place, however in this context it is relevant.

-Alan

Interesting post, though you seem to neglect Christian existentialism (Kierkegaard, Dostoevsky, and Pascal) even though you mention Alyosha.

Also, I understand that you need a good punch line for the blog. But isn’t it incredibly condescending to try to judge a book on how it will move non-believers towards God? Without proper respect there can’t be real dialogue. Would you like a review of Dawkins’ latest that said, “I think his logical arguments will help disabuse many Christians of their silly superstitions?”

Hoosers last blog post..Recent Books